The history and actuality of Japanese internal migration: achievements and limits of the “rural return” phenomenon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v15i43.957Keywords:
Lifestyle migration, amenity migration, rural return, neo-ruralism, Japanese countrysideAbstract
Currently, there is a migration of young Japanese to the countryside known as “rural return” or “return to rural life”, a phenomenon that has been investigated in Japanese academia and has become important for municipal and local policy decisions, with the aim of repopulating areas that have historically been losing population. Based on an extensive bibliographical analysis of this migration phenomenon, which has not been much discussed abroad, the article highlights some characteristics of rural return in Japan. As a result of this research, it is exposed that, although the social commitment of these young people to rural communities is pointed out and the question of social classes is not manifested as in other countries which experience migration to rurality, the growing interest of young people could introduce new actors who have not been before in the framework of the analysis of the theory of rural return.Downloads
References
Beale, C. L. (1975). The Revival ofPopulationGrowth in NonmetropolitanAmerica (ERS-605). Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Benson, M. C. (2009). A desire for difference: British lifestyle migration to southwest France. In M. Benson, & K. O’Reilly (Eds.), Lifestyle Migration:
Expectations, Aspirations and Experiences (pp. 121-136). Routledge. Cadieux, K. V., & Hurley, P. T. (2011). Amenity migration, exurbia, and emerging rural landscapes: global natural amenity as place and as process.
GeoJournal, 76, 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9335-0
Flognfeldt, T. (2006). Second homes, work commuting and amenity migrants in Norway’s mountain areas. In L. A. G. Moss (Ed.), The Amenity Migrants: Seeking and Sustaining Mountains and their Cultures (pp.232?244). CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990842.0232
Furusato Ch?ki Kaiki Shien Center [Centro de Apoyo para el Retorno Rural]. (2023). Chihoijyu no Genjyo ni tsuite, 2023nen ban [Situación actual de la migración rural, versión de 2023]. https://www.furusatokaiki.net/wp/wp- content/uploads/2024/03/webnews_furusatokaiki_ranking_2023.pdf
Graff, L. (2021). Huir de la ciudad por el campo: el fenómeno del neorru- ralismo francés. GeoGraphos, 12, 193-218. https://doi.org/10.14198/GEOGRA2021.12.140
Hayamizu, K. (2018). Simple life no Seijisei. [Politicidad de la vida sencilla]. Shik?hin Bunka Kenky?, (3), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.34365/shiko- hinbunka.2018.3_41
Howard, E. (2018). Ciudades Jardín del mañana. Círculo de Bellas Artes. Ishikawa, N. (2018). The “Return to the Country” phenomenon in Japan examined in relation to the concept of lifestyle migration. Bulletin of the
Hiroshima University Museum, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15027/47293
Isoda, Y. (2017). Is Japanese “Rural Regression” a precursor of counterur- banization? (100099, Presentación en Nihon Chiri Gakkai [Sociedad Geográfica de Japón]). https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ajg/2017a/0/2017a_100099/_pdf/-char/ja
It?, H. (2012). Nariwai o tsukuru: jinsei o nusumarenai hatarakikata [Crear los trabajos para la vida: manual de trabajo para que no te roben tu vida]. Shoseki.
Kasami, K. (2018). Inaka o Tsukuru. [Crear el campo]. Commons.
Kokudok?tsush? [Ministerio de Territorio, Infraestructuras, Transportes y Turismo]. (1969). ShinZenkokuS?g?KaihatsuKeikaku [Nuevo Plan Nacional de Desarrollo Integral]. https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/001135929.pdf
Masuda, H. (2014). Chihou Sh?metsu: Tokyo Ikkyoku Shuch? ga Maneku Jink? Kyugen [Desaparición de regiones rurales: descenso rápido de la población causado por la concentración poblacional en Tokio]. Chu?k?ron Shinsha.
Matsuo, M. (1971). N?gy? Sonraku no Sh?dan Ijy? [Migración masiva de los pueblos agrícolas]. N?rin Tokei Kenky?, 7(1), 17-23.
McIntyre, N. (2009). Rethinking Amenity Migration: Integration Mobility, Lifestyle and Social-Ecological Systems. Die Erde: Journal of the Geogra- phical Society of Berlin, 140(3), 229-250.
Mitchell, C. (2004). Making sense of counterurbanization. Journal of Rural Studies, 20(1), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00031-7
Mitsuda, H. (1987). Sonraku Syakai Taikei Ron [Teoría de los sistemas sociales rurales]. Minerva Shob?.
Mitsuda, H. (1999). Neorruralism Ron Saik?. [Reconsideración del neorru- ralismo]. Syakaigakubu Ronsh?, 32, 65-81.
Morikawa, H. (1988). On the phenomenon of population turnaround or “cou- nterurbanization”. Geographical review of Japan series A, 61(9), 685?705. https://doi.org/10.4157/grj1984a.61.9_685
Moss, L. A. G. (Ed.). (2006). The Amenity Migrants: Seeking and Sustaining Mountains and their Cultures. CABI.
Moss, L. A. G. & Glorioso, R. S. (Eds.), (2014). Global Amenity Migration: Transforming Rural Culture Economy & Landscape. The New Ecology Press.
Muramatsu, K. (2017). History and actuality of the Back-to-the-land mo- vements in Japan: towards a genealogical analysis. Kokusainihongaku, (14), 167-192.
Nagatomo, J. (2013). Lifestyle Migration: the Japanese immigrants in Australia. Sairy?sha.
Nagatomo, J. (2015). Conceptualizing Lifestyle Migration: A Literature Review in Migration Studies. Journal of International Studies: Kwansei Gakuin University, 4(1), 23-32.
Nelson, P. B. (2006). Geographic perspective on amenity migration across the USA: national-, regional- and local scale analysis. In L. A. G. Moss (Ed.), The Amenity Migrants: Seeking and Sustaining Mountains and their Cultures (pp. 55-72). CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990842.0055
Nishimura, R., Mitsuichi, K., & Sakuma, Y. (2015). A study of the transition of the relationship of migrants and local residents in the district manage- mente activities in remote areas: In case of Irokawa district in Nachikat- suura town, Higashimuro-gun Wakayama prefecture. Journal of the City Planning Institute ofJapan, (50)3, 1303-1309. https://doi.org/10.11361/ journalcpij.50.1303
Nishino, T. (2024). Characteristics of the “Return to Rural Living” phenomenon in Japan and local government’s responsibility. Chiikiseisaku Kenky?, 26(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.20635/0002000103
Odagiri, T. (2014). Nosanson wa sh?metsushinai, [Los pueblos rurales no des- aparecen]. Iwanami shoten.
Odagiri, T. (2024). Nigiyakana kaso o tsukuru: N?son Saisei no Seisaku K?s?. [Creación de una despoblación animada: Iniciativas políticas para la re- generación rural]. N?sangyoson Bunka Ky?kai.
O’Reilly, K., & Benson, M. (2009). Lifestyle Migration: Escaping to the Good Life? In K. O’Reilly & M. Benson (Eds.), Lifestyle Migration: Expectations, Aspirations and Experiences (pp. 1-30). Routledge.
Rodríguez, A. B., & Trabada, X. E. (1991). De la ciudad al campo: el fenómeno social neorruralista en España. Política y Sociedad, 9, 73-86. https://revis- tas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/POSO9191220073A
Saito, K. (2022). El Capital en la era del Antropoceno. Penguin Random House.
Sait?, K., & Matsumoto, T. (Coords.). (2023). Komon no Jichiron [Teoría de la autonomía de los comunes]. Sh?eisha.
Sakuno, H. (2016). The increase of migrants into local areas and regional correspondence: what does “return to the country” mean for local areas? Keizaichirigakunenh?, 62(4), 324-345.
Sato, H. (2023). Yomigaeru Denen Toshi Kokka: Masayoshi ?hira, Ebenezer Howard, Kunio Yanagita no K?s? [Resucitar el Estado constituido por ciudad jardín: los proyectos de Masayoshi ?hira, Ebenezer Howard y Kunio Yanagita]. Chikuma Shob?.
S?mush? [Ministerio de Asuntos Internos y Comunicaciones]. (2015). “De- nenkaiki” ni kansuru Chosa Houkokusho [Informe de investigación sobre el “retorno rural”]. https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000538258.pdf
S?mush? [Ministerio de Asuntos Internos y Comunicaciones]. (2024). Chii- kiryoku S?z? Group no Shinki-Kakujy? shisaku tou [Medidas nuevas y ampliadas del Grupo de Creación de Capacidades Regionales, etc.]. https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000959445.pdf
Suzuki, S. (2023). Amenity Migration of Working-Age People to the New Vacation Home Area in Karuizawa and Surrounding Areas. Geographical review of Japan series A, 96(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.4157/grj.96.1
Tanigaki, M. (2017). A Study on Lifestyle Migration Behavior into Diminishing Local Municipalities [PhD thesis, Osaka Metropolitan University].
Teng, Y. (2021). Internal Migration Intentions of Young Adults Living in Tokyo: Focusing on the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Quarterly Journal of Geography, 73(4), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.5190/tga.73.4_250
Tomiyama, K. (2022, 8 de julio). Ikkyoku Sh?chu kara Takyoku “Sh?jy?” e [De la concentración unipolar a la multipolar]. SMBC Business Club InfoLounge. https://infolounge.smbcc-businessclub.jp/articles/624
Tsunakawa, Y. (2021). Analysis of real estate transactions in the exurb. A Case Study of Karuizawa, Nagano Prefecture. Bungaku Kenky? Ronsh?, 55, 63?79. http://hdl.handle.net/10291/22023
Wakabayashi, K., & Hatanaka, A. (2023). Wasurerareta Nihonjin o Hiraku: Miyamoto Tsuneichi to “Seken” no Democracy [Introducción a “Los japoneses ol- vidados”: Tsuneichi Miyamoto y la democracia de la “sociedad”]. Kokuch?sha.
Watanabe, T. (2003). Tian-yuan and Time --A Study of Tao Yuan-ming’s Gui-qu-lai-xi Ci. Chugoku Buengakuh?, (66), 31-57.
Woods, M. (2010). Rural (Key Ideas in Geography). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844304
Yamagami, T. (2003). Spatio-temporal Structure of Population Growth in Major Metropolitan Areas in Japan. Geographical Review of Japan, 76(4), 187?210. https://doi.org/10.4157/grj.76.187
Yanagita, K. (2000). Yanagita Kunio Zensh? [Obras completas de Kunio Yanagita]. Chikuma Shob?.
Zenkoku Kaso Ch?ki Renmei [Federación Nacional de Áreas Subpobladas]. (2022). Banco de Datos. https://www.kaso-net.or.jp/publics/index/19/
Zushi, N. (2022). Denen Kaiki. [Retorno rural]. En Foro Regional de zonas montañosas y medianamente montañosas (Eds.). Ch?sankan Ch?ki Hand book. [Manual de la región montañosa y medianamente montañosa] (pp.
-72). N?sangyoson Bunka Ky?kai.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-12-18 (2)
- 2025-12-18 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 México y la Cuenca del Pacífico
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides open access to all its contents, in adherence to the principle that making research freely available supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
MyCP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, also known as CC BY-NC.
Contents are published in both PDF and XML formats.
Authors who publish in México y la Cuenca del Pacífico must accept the following conditions:
Pursuant to Mexican copyright laws, México y la Cuenca del Pacífico acknowledges and respects the authors’ moral right and ownership of property rights, which will be assigned to the University of Guadalajara to publish the articles in an open-access mode.
México y la Cuenca del Pacífico does not charge the authors any fees for receiving and processing their articles.
Authors are permitted to enter into other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article version published in México y la Cuenca del Pacífico (for example, publishing it in an institutional repository or in other printed or electronic media) as long as they clearly state that the piece was originally published in México y la Cuenca del Pacífico.
Pursuant to the above, once the article is approved for publication, authors must send the Assignment of Rights Agreement form duly filled and signed. This form must be sent to mexicoylacuenca@gmail.com as a PDF file.
Readers/users of México y la Cuenca del Pacífico can freely access the journal new issues as soon as they are uploaded. Readers/users are allowed to cite, share (both electronically and physically), print and distribute the material, provided they expressly state that the work was originally published in México y la Cuenca del Pacífico. Contents are to be properly cited and never for commercial purposes.
